Showing posts with label GDP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GDP. Show all posts

Stagflation and Budget 2009

It is possible to have inflation and economy stagnation happening at the same time. Whilst while we know what's inflation (rise in prices of goods and services) stagnation is when the economy grows at about 2-3%. You may want to ask what the heck is a recession then- a recession is when our economy grows...I should say contract rather than growth, at a negative rate. Malaysia is not at economic stagnation yet, at the expected growth rate of 4.6% in 2008 (Source: MIER), but it is very near that stage with the slowed down growth happening this year. At the the same time, consumer prices are also spiking sky high as a result of the fuel price hike in June 2008. The two noticeable indicators that stand out like a sore thumb are:
  • highest 27-year inflation rate occuring in June 2008 at 7.7%
  • GDP is downtrending with constant downward revisions very month (now at 4.6%)
Based on the above ground rules our economic condition is very close to what's being called stagflation- the combination of inflation and economy stagnation. The tricky thing about stagflation is that you are being faced by the rising costs of doing business, but you can't raise the selling price of your products because your business will loose sales volume if you do so.

Historically Malaysia achieved very high GDP rates from 1988 to 1996, in excess of 9%, hitting 10% in 1996. Those were the greatest Mahathir years. During Mahathir's tenure as PM, the only years when Malaysia hit a technical negative growth was in 1985 and 1998- and those were also the years of global economic recession.

Bank Negara and sound monetary policies


I applaud the manner Bank Negara handled inflation by not increasing the overnight policy rate unchanged at 3.50% on 25th July 2008. You may want to ask what's an overnight policy rate about?? It's the interest rate which one bank charges another for lending available funds. This rate is governed by BNM and if it raises we are screwed if we have home loans and so on, because interest rates are going to rise. So what if BNM does not increase this rate? You see, by the book, the central bank should increase interest rates to curb the supply of broad money during inflation but Zeti did not do it. High interest rates will result in the higher cost of obtaining credit- when cost of capital is more expensive to obtain, the supply of money reduces, spending reduces thus inflation is kept in check. For people in who have taken up loans the idea is to force them out of it via bankruptcy. That's the harsh reality of economics.

Zeti in fact recognized the root cause of Malaysia's inflation- which is not natural but cost push inflation, as a result of the government's fiscal policy of increasing petrol prices by 41% overnight at the beginning of June 2008. Immediately following this electricity tarrifs increased 26%; hauliers and fowarders increased their costs by 30-40%. Zeti knew that there's no point increasing interest rates because if BNM did so, Malaysia would be in bigger trouble because the inflation will still be there. That means inflation + higher interest rates. I remember back in 1998, many home owners failed to settle their home loans. I for one was on the lucky side as I got my house pretty cheap because demand for property in that area was bad. Zeti is certainly much smarter that Pak Lah and the rest of the Putrajaya goons. Gotta thank Zeti for watching closely the BN Government.

Budget 2009

This year's budget must prop up the economy ie expansionary, by the adopting the following measures:
-the government must seriously look into further reduction of the petrol price. I understand that it was a global oil crisis at that time but petrol price should not have been increased overnight!!! Luckily I miss that Parliament session with Wee Choo Keong in June otherwise I would have kicked Badawi's ass myself.

-2009 must have tax cuts in personal income tax (corporate tax reduction is a foregone conclusion) to stimulate personal spending and boost the retail industry.
-adopt a deficit budget, with expansionary fiscal policies. A deficit budget of about 4% is expected this time around.
-increase tax allowance for families with children.
-remove service tax completely- service tax holiday for 2009.
-control the prices of steel to prevent construction companies from going bankrupt.
Prices of essential goods will not reduce much unless they are controlled items because they are sticky-downward; and wages, depends a lot on the people's sentiments on inflation. Hopefully inflation will taper off in Q4 to finish at below 6% for the year 2009. With the situation cooler, wage inflation will also reduce, easing out the higher cost of staffing for employers.

Deficit 2009 budget yes, but what's the source of funding it?

Racism and its impact on Malaysia


It's right to say Ketuanan Rakyat in lieu of Ketuanan Melayu. I'm referring to Anwar's very recent speech at Kampung Baru on the eve of the expiry of his ban from Malaysian politics. The term Ketuanan Melayu is deeply entrenched in racism- a slogan concocted by Umno politicians to acquire buy-in from the Malay masses. Ketuanan Melayu depicts the scenario whereby the Malay race is 'boss' to other ethnic groups in Malaysia, albeit reluctance acceptance from other non-Malay ethnic groups but due to the social contract set out in Section 153 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. This of course, has helped Barisan Nasional win elections (national and party elections)… till the year 2008 that is.



The Umno administration has been singing the same tune until the cows came home- though on the surface accepted by all races in Malaysia, the Ketuanan Melayu concept did not get us anywhere but served only to create more brain drain. Malaysia's population is roughly cut up by the following composition- Malay (above 50%), Chinese (above 23%), Indian (above 7%) and Others (20%). I was internet- researching on migration statistics of people moving out of Malaysia when I stumbled upon some astounding facts- there are about 5.3 million ethnic Chinese in Malaysia but this figure is overshadowed by 6.2 million Malaysian Chinese staying out of Malaysia. I could not find statistics on Indian race migration from Malaysia though. Economics-wise, in terms of GDP growth in 2007, Malaysia (5.9%) ranks after China (10.7%), India (9.2%), Vietnam (8.2%), Singapore (7.9%) and Hong Kong (6.8%). The sub-6% growth is still 'okay' by the sleeping PM and Bank Negara standards eventhough we have slipped, overtaken by Vietnam, India and on a few occasions Burma, Thailand and Indonesia. In terms of growth Vietnam was already 6% back in the year 2003.



Malaysia is not doing too bad in terms of GDP per capita- in 2007, seeing an increase from prior years- it is ahead of Thailand ($9.2K), Indonesia ($3.9K), India ($3.8K), Vietnam ($3.1) and Burma ($1.8K); but behind Hong Kong ($37.3), Australia ($33.33) and Singapore ($31.4K). But at $12.9K, Malaysia is about 41% (nearly half!) of its neighbor Singapore in terms of citizen wealth.



The Ketuanan Melayu concept is an enclosed apartheid concept- it fails to view nation building in a holistic perspective by shutting off other ethnic groups from full participation. The irked and irritated non-Malays leave Malaysia gradually bringing along their valuable skill sets and ideas to other countries thus draining Malaysia of a very scarce resource- brain power.

Years from now, when the Malay population moves up from 50% to say 95%, there will be very little difference in terms of Bumiputera rights between Ali and his neighbor because the vast majority by then would all have special rights. If everyone has special rights what's so special about it then. If all that is left are tuan (bosses), where are the workers then?

Think big picture. Abolish all racial discrimination.


GDP- the total dollar amount of goods and services produced in a country.

GDP growth rate- an important indicator of economic health- the growth rate is the percentage increase or decrease of GDP from the previous measurement cycle.

GDP Growth % of selected countries

r
Source: CIA World Factbook

















GDP growth % 2003 rank 2004 rank 2005 rank 2006 rank 2007 rank
Australia 3.6 6 3 9 3.5 10 2.7 11 2.7 11
Burma 3.3 8 -0.5 11 -1.3 11 5.2 7 3 10
China 8 1 9.1 1 9.1 1 10.2 1 10.7 1
Hong Kong -3 11 3.3 7 7.9 3 7.3 4 6.8 5
India 4.3 4 8.3 2 6.2 6 8.4 3 9.2 2
Indonesia 3.5 7 4.1 6 4.9 8 5.6 6 5.5 7
Malaysia 4.2 5 5.2 5 7.1 5 5.2 7 5.9 6
Singapore 2.2 10 1.1 10 8.1 2 6.4 5 7.9 4
Thailand 5.2 3 6.7 4 6.1 7 4.5 9 4.8 8
USA 2.45 9 3.1 8 4.4 9 3.2 10 3.2 9
Vietnam 6 2 7.2 3 7.7 4 8.5 2 8.2 3

GDP per capita of selected countries

,
Source: CIA World Factbook

















per capita 2003 rank 2004 rank 2005 rank 2006 rank 2007 rank
Australia $27,000 2 $29,000 2 $30,700 3 $31,600 3 $33,300 3
Burma $1,660 11 $1,800 11 $1,700 11 $1,700 11 $1,800 10
China $4,400 7 $5,000 7 $5,600 7 $6,800 7 0 11
Hong Kong $26,000 3 $28,800 3 $34,200 2 $34,000 2 $37,300 2
India $2,540 9 $2,900 9 $3,100 9 $3,400 9 $3,800 8
Indonesia $3,100 8 $3,200 8 $3,500 8 $3,600 8 $3,900 7
Malaysia $9,300 5 $9,000 5 $9,700 5 $12,000 5 $12,900 5
Singapore $24,000 4 $23,700 4 $27,800 4 $28,600 4 $31,400 4
Thailand $6,900 6 $7,400 6 $8,100 6 $8,600 6 $9,200 6
USA $37,600 1 $37,800 1 $40,100 1 $41,600 1 $44,000 1
Vietnam $2,250 10 $2,500 10 $2,700 10 $2,800 10 $3,100 9